HARRISON v. WIENTJES

83-1360.

466 So.2d 125 (1985)

Donald H. HARRISON v. Norbert WIENTJES.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip H. Butler of Robison & Belser, Montgomery, for appellant.

Perry O. Hooper and Thomas T. Gallion III, of Hooper, Gallion & Wilkerson, Montgomery, for appellee.


JONES, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Plaintiff in a civil damage suit. We address each of three alleged evidentiary errors separately and set out the necessary facts in our discussion of each issue.

I. Introduction of Evidence after the Completion of Closing Arguments

Appellant's/Defendant's first argument is that the trial court erred in allowing Plaintiff to introduce evidence after the evidence portion of the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases