ZIMMERMAN v. LASKY

No. C2-85-908.

374 N.W.2d 212 (1985)

Daniel E. ZIMMERMAN, Appellant, v. Joseph LASKY, Clerk of Court, Thomas Bujold, Judge of County Court, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied November 26, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel E. Zimmerman, pro se.

Alan L. Mitchell, St. Louis County Atty. Barbara Russ, Asst. County Atty. Duluth, Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Minn. Atty. Gen., Peter M. Ackerberg, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondents.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and SEDGWICK and LANSING, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal of the dismissal of appellant's complaint. Appellant claims the trial court erred by (1) finding the respondent judge judicially immune from suit, (2) finding respondent clerk of court was acting within his authority in administering the collection of appellant's fine, and (3) denying appellant's motion for temporary and permanent injunctive relief. We affirm.

FACTS

On January 9, 1984, appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases