JADWIN v. CITY OF DAYTON

No. C3-85-1436.

379 N.W.2d 194 (1985)

James A. JADWIN, Mary Jo Jadwin, Respondents, v. CITY OF DAYTON, et al., Appellants, and Earl Dehn, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 24, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marshall H. Tanick, Richard J. White, Tanick & Heins, Minneapolis, for respondents.

George C. Hoff, Hoff & Allen, P.A., Eden Prairie, for appellants.

Heard, considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and SEDGWICK and LANSING, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal is from a default judgment in favor of respondents James and Mary Jo Jadwin. The trial court struck appellants' answer and entered judgment for respondents under Minn.R.Civ.P. 37.02. We reverse.

FACTS

James and Mary Jo Jadwin sued the City of Dayton, its mayor, and its council members (in both their official and individual capacities) in Hennepin County District Court. The suit arose when the city denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases