1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 371 N.W.2d
  5. 371 N.W.2d 201 (1985)
 

SIBBERT v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. C7-84-571.

371 N.W.2d 201 (1985)

Roger SIBBERT, et al., Respondents, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied September 9, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kay Nord Hunt, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Diane C. Hanson, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Respondent Sibbert commenced this action against appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), claiming that he is entitled to recover underinsured motorist benefits under a policy of automobile insurance issued to him by State Farm. The trial court found exclusionary language in the policy to be inconsistent with the purposes of the No-Fault Act and granted summary judgment in Sibbert's favor. The Minnesota Court of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases