1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 133 Ill.
  5. 133 Ill. App.3d 435 (1985)
 

CITY OF CHICAGO v. ILLINOIS COMMERCE COM.

Nos. 83-1544, 83-2767 cons.

133 Ill. App.3d 435 (1985)

478 N.E.2d 1369

THE CITY OF CHICAGO et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee (Commonwealth Edison Company, Intervening Defendant-Appellee).

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (1st Division).

Opinion filed May 13, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, of Springfield, James D. Montgomery, Corporation Counsel, Shea, Rogal & Associates, Ltd., Stefan H. Kerieger and Randall D. Schmidt, both of Edwin F. Mandel Legal Aid Clinic, and Pope, Ballard, Shepard & Fowle, Ltd., all of Chicago, and Wayne L. Emery and Kenneth R. Pepperney, both of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Jeff Paulson and Stephen J. Moore, Assistant Attorneys General, of Chicago, and Gerald W. Shea, Ira A. Rogal, and Robert N. Hutchinson, of counsel), for appellants.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, of Springfield (Hercules F. Bolos and E. King Poor, Special Assistant Attorneys General, of Chicago, of counsel), for appellee Illinois Commerce Commission.

Richard G. Ferguson, Laurence D. Lasky, Paul M. Murphy, and Karl B. Anderson, all of Isham, Lincoln & Beale, of Chicago, for appellee Commonwealth Edison Company.

Judgments affirmed.

JUSTICE BUCKLEY delivered the opinion of the court:

The present appeals arise out of interim and permanent rate increases granted to Commonwealth Edison Company (Edison) by the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission). On January 8, 1982, Edison filed revised tariffs with the Commission reflecting an $805 million annual increase in rates charged to its customers. Edison also requested that approximately one-half of the proposed increase...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases