1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 164 Cal.App.3d
  5. 164 Cal.App.3d 401 (1985)
 

PABITZKY v. FRAGER

Docket No. B006340.

164 Cal.App.3d 401 (1985)

210 Cal. Rptr. 426

WALLACE PABITZKY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NORV FRAGER et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

February 4, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Ronald E. Faulk for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Spray, Gould & Bowers, Daniel O. Howard, Michael W. Champ, Hill, Genson, Even, Crandall & Wade, William R. Lowe and William F. Zulch for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KINGSLEY, Acting P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal from judgments (orders of dismissal) entered after orders sustaining without leave to amend demurrers to their fifth amended complaint.

The facts are simple. Plaintiff, William Pabitzky, was insured by defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) under a policy written by that company's agent, defendant Norv Frager. In the early morning of July 30, 1980...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases