Judgment affirmed.
The evidence presented at trial amply supports the jury verdict finding defendant guilty of burglary in the third degree. The evidence of a forced entry, coupled with the fact that property had been removed from the premises and that an undercover police officer personally observed defendant inside complainant's upholstery store, justifies the conclusion that defendant knowingly entered and unlawfully remained in the store with the intent to commit...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.