MATTER OF SADOFSKI


98 N.J. 434 (1985)

487 A.2d 700

IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH E. SADOFSKI, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 8, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick J. Monahan, Jr., argued the cause for complainant Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct.

Morris Brown argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Morris Brown and Frederick J. Dennehy, on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

This proceeding against respondent, Joseph E. Sadofski, a judge of the Superior Court, arises out of two complaints filed with the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (ACJC), identified as the Schuster and W.G. matters. The Committee found that respondent had breached his duty to preserve and protect the dignity of courtroom proceedings contrary to the mandates of Canons 1 (a judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary), 2A (a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases