1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 172 Cal.App.3d
  5. 172 Cal.App.3d 357 (1985)
 

HOFMANN CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. A030692.

172 Cal.App.3d 357 (1985)

218 Cal. Rptr. 355

HOFMANN CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, Respondent; EDMUND J. SMAYSTRLA et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

September 23, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Bernard C. Kearns, J. Timothy Doyle, Roxanne L. Holmes and Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Francis R. Giambroni, Jeffery V. Bacich, Katherine A. Montgomery and Giambroni, Dear & Bacich for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

SABRAW, J.

The issue presented by this case is whether discovery of certain admittedly relevant information can be accomplished by a discovery order requiring the defendant to turn over to plaintiff its complete list of customers. We conclude the discovery order is too broad and expansive and therefore grant relief.

(1a) In a petition for extraordinary relief, Hofmann Corporation challenges a discovery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases