Order affirmed, with costs.
After the subject property was damaged by fire, plaintiffs landlords commenced this action claiming that defendant tenant was liable in tort and for breach of the lease, due to an alleged act of arson by a subtenant. Upon a review of the provisions of the lease, it is clear that the tenant may not be held liable under the lease for any damage to the property caused by fire. Moreover, the complaint fails to allege that the tenant in any...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
