BANKE, Chief Judge.
The appellant sued the appellees to recover for alleged medical malpractice. The trial court granted the appellees' motion for summary judgment on the ground that the affidavits filed by the appellant in response to the motion were not timely under Rule 21 of the local rules of the Superior Court of Clayton County. Held:
Although Rule 21 is not before us, and we may not take judicial cognizance of it (see Harris v. Harris,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.