Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, First Department, on March 14, 1955. In this proceeding to discipline respondent for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and the respondent cross-moves to disaffirm said report.
The Special Referee sustained charges of professional misconduct, alleging that respondent forged or caused to be forged the names of his clients to a general...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.