In re KATHLEEN M.

Nos. 84-006, 84-007, 84-122.

126 N.H. 379 (1985)

In re KATHLEEN M. In re KATHLEEN D. In re CHARLES W.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

April 18, 1985


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory H. Smith, attorney general (Peter J. Minkow, attorney, on the brief and orally), for the State in the cases of Kathleen M. and Charles W.

Gregory H. Smith, attorney general (Douglas L. Patch, assistant attorney general, on the brief), by brief for the State in the case of Kathleen D.

Steven H. Slovenski, of Concord, by brief and orally, for Kathleen M.

Geiger and Heiser, of Penacook (Richard W. Heiser on the brief), by brief for Kathleen D.

Bamberger, Shaw & Pfundstein, of Concord (Donald J. Pfundstein on the brief and orally), for Charles W.


DOUGLAS, J.

These three cases are on appeal from the Merrimack County Probate Court (Cushing, J.) pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7. They present the common issue whether the physician-patient privilege set forth in RSA 329:26 is applicable to involuntary commitment hearings pursuant to RSA chapter 135-B. We hold that no per se exception exists for such hearings, but that the physician-patient privilege is qualified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases