1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 206 N.J.
  5. 206 N.J. Super. 294 (1985)
 

ARROYO v. ARNOLD-BAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC.

206 N.J. Super. 294 (1985)

502 A.2d 106

HECTOR G. ARROYO AND DEBORAH A. ARROYO, PLAINTIFFS, v. ARNOLD-BAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC., JERRY F. ARNOLD, NORMAN BAKER, MARGRET BRESLIN, WALTER G. FLEGAL, JR., DOROTHY I. FLEGAL, AND HUMPHREYS EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC., INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Burlington County.

Decided January 8, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard J. Batt for plaintiffs.

Joseph M. Suarez for defendants Arnold-Baker & Associates, Jerry Arnold, Norman Baker, and Margret Breslin (Suarez & Suarez, attorneys).

Joseph I. McCullough, Jr. for defendants Walter and Dorothy Flegal.

HAINES, A.J.S.C.

This opinion addresses the question of whether real estate brokers and their employees are subject to the provisions of the Consumer Fraud Act. N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq. The defendants, relying upon Neveroski v. Blair, 141 N.J.Super. 365 (App.Div. 1976), claim that they are not subject to these provisions and move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. This opinion holds that

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases