INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 14 v. AMPRO CORP.

No. CO-84-931.

361 N.W.2d 138 (1985)

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14, of Fridley, Minnesota, Appellant, v. AMPRO CORPORATION, Portapit Division, defendant and third party plaintiff, Respondent, Walter P. Kehler, etc., et al., Defendants, United Foam Corporation, Third Party Defendant, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied March 29, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph F. Lulic, Cosgrove & Hanson, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Robert E. Salmon, William D. Flaskamp, Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson, Adamson, Flaskamp & Brennan, Minneapolis, for AMPRO Corp.

Robert W. Murnane, Murnane, Conlin, White, Brandt & Hoffman, St. Paul, for United Foam Corp.

Heard, considered and decided by LESLIE, P.J., and WOZNIAK and LANSING, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Appellant Independent School District No. 14 (ISD) of Fridley, Minnesota, appeals from the trial court's judgment granting, at the close of all of the evidence, the motion of respondents AMPRO Corp., Portapit Division (AMPRO), and United Foam Corp. (United Foam) for a directed verdict. AMPRO and United Foam filed a notice of review with this court, seeking review of the trial court's pretrial denial of their motion to substitute the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases