GENERAL TELEPHONE v. BOTHELL

Nos. 11975-3-I; 13138-9-I.

39 Wn. App. 453 (1985)

693 P.2d 215

GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST, INC., Respondent, v. THE CITY OF BOTHELL, ET AL, Appellants. THE CITY OF REDMOND, Appellant, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST, INC., Respondent. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST, INC., Respondent, v. THE CITY OF REDMOND, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

January 7, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Wallace, City Attorney, and Ogden, Ogden & Murphy, for appellants Bothell, et al.

Larry Martin, City Attorney, Wayne D. Tanaka, Assistant, and Ogden, Ogden & Murphy, for appellant Redmond.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, James R. Cunningham, Senior Assistant, and Patricia H. O'Brien, Assistant, for appellant State.

Livengood, Silvernale, Carter & Tjossem and Robert P. Tjossem, for respondent.


RINGOLD, J.

In separate actions, General Telephone Company (General) was granted summary judgments against the cities of Bothell and Redmond. The trial courts concluded that a tariff published by General preempted certain city ordinances requiring undergrounding of telephone facilities. The appeals are consolidated here. Bothell also appeals from a finding by the lower court that a material issue of fact exists as to whether Bothell's ordinance was enacted in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases