MONMOUTH CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC. v. CHRYSLER CORP.


203 N.J. Super. 281 (1985)

496 A.2d 741

MONMOUTH CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC., PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND RITTENHOUSE LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., INTERVENOR-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 26, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis R. LaFiura argued the cause for appellant Chrysler Corporation (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys; Clyde A. Szuch on the brief).

Martin J. McGreevy argued the cause for intervenor-appellant Rittenhouse Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. (Carton, Nary, Witt & Arvanitis, attorneys; James R. Gorman on the brief).

Liliann Messina Nugent argued the cause for respondent Monmouth Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Warren W. Wilentz, of counsel and Ms. Nugent on the brief).

Before Judges ANTELL, J.H. COLEMAN and SIMPSON.


The opinion of the court was delivered by, ANTELL, P.J.A.D.

This is an appeal by respondent Chrysler Corporation (hereinafter "Chrysler") and intervenor Rittenhouse Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. (hereinafter "Rittenhouse") from a determination by the Motor Vehicle Franchise Committee of the Department of Law and Public Safety precluding Chrysler from enfranchising Rittenhouse as a Chrysler and Plymouth dealer. The decision of the Committee, which affirmed the findings and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases