SHARROW v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO.

No. 1352, September Term, 1984.

63 Md. App. 412 (1985)

492 A.2d 977

RONALD M. SHARROW, CHARTERED v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

May 23, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Freishtat, Baltimore (W. Michael Mullen and Freishtat & Sandler, Baltimore, on the brief), for appellant.

Michael J. Budow, Bethesda (Richard E. Schimel and Budow and Noble, P.C., Bethesda, on the brief), for appellees.

Argued before WILNER, BLOOM and ROBERT M. BELL, JJ.


WILNER, Judge.

Appellant Ronald M. Sharrow is an attorney. Appellees are, respectively, an automobile insurance company (State Farm) and two of its employees (Burns and Rinehardt). In a three-count complaint filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, appellant claimed that, in negotiating and settling a claim directly with his client, appellees tortiously interfered with his attorney/client contingent fee contract.

The case reaches us from the sustaining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases