UR. RED. A. of PGH. et al. v. HACKADAY et al.

Nos. 2342 C.D. 1984 and 2343 C.D. 1984.

93 Pa.Commw. 378 (1985)

Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh and Steve Catranel Construction Company, Inc. v. Marilyn A. Hackaday and the City of Pittsburgh. Steve Catranel Construction Company, Inc., Appellant. Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh and Steve Catranel Construction Company, Inc. v. Marilyn A. Hackaday and the City of Pittsburgh. Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh, Appellant.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

December 9, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard G. Kotarba, with him, Kevin F. McKeegan, Meyer, Unkovic & Scott, for appellants.

Carl Marcus, for appellee, Marilyn A. Hackaday.

Norma Chase, with her, John Regis Valaw, Assistant City Solicitor, and D. R. Pellegrini, City Solicitor, for appellee, City of Pittsburgh.

Argued October 7, 1985, before Judges ROGERS and PALLADINO, and Senior Judge KALISH, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY SENIOR JUDGE KALISH, December 9, 1985:

The property in question was a vacant lot owned by A & R Solomon. Being delinquent in taxes the City Treasurer sold it at a Treasurer's sale to the City of Pittsburgh. On June 15, 1983, while the City of Pittsburgh had title, the Urban Redevelopment Authority,1 unaware of title being in the City, filed a declaration of taking, setting forth that A & R Solomon are the owners. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases