YACENDA FOOD MANAGEMENT CORP. v. N.J. HIGHWAY AUTHORITY


203 N.J. Super. 264 (1985)

496 A.2d 733

YACENDA FOOD MANAGEMENT CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND DAVID A. HELLMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, AND MARRIOTT CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 19, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Melillo argued the cause for appellants (Minish and Williams, attorneys; George J. Minish and Robert J. Melillo on the brief).

Philip R. Carlin argued the cause for respondent Marriott Corporation (Goldberg and Carlin, P.A. attorneys; Philip R. Carlin, on the brief).

Arthur Grossman argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Highway Authority (Fox and Fox, attorneys).

Daniel D. Caldwell argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey Turnpike Authority (Wolff & Samson, attorneys; David Samson and Daniel D. Caldwell, of counsel).

Before FRITZ, GAULKIN and LONG, JJ.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG, J.A.D.

On this appeal and cross-appeal we have been asked to decide whether the New Jersey Highway Authority (NJHA) is required to publicly bid for the restaurant operation services provided on the Garden State Parkway (the Parkway) which it administers. Our reading of N.J.S.A. 27:12B-14 constrains us to answer that question in the negative.

The case arose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases