ROSEBERG v. STEEN

No. C5-84-1024.

363 N.W.2d 102 (1985)

Arthur ROSEBERG, Respondent, v. Donald STEEN and Dorothy Steen, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 19, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. O'Gorman, Oistad & Opheim, Ada, for respondent.

Roger J. Minch, Tenneson, Serkland, Lundberg, Erickson & Marcil, Fargo, N.D., for appellants.

Heard, considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and LANSING and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Don and Dorothy Steen appeal from the trial court's order terminating an escrow account and ordering the proceeds paid to respondent Arthur Roseberg. The escrow account resulted from a replevin action by Roseberg for possession of the Steens' 1983 PIK (payment in kind) wheat allotment. The grain was sold by agreement of the parties and the proceeds placed in escrow. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Respondent Arthur...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases