GARCIA v. SNEDEKER


199 N.J. Super. 254 (1985)

489 A.2d 175

THOMAS GARCIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CLIFFORD W. SNEDEKER, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, AND THE UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, AND UNDERWRITERS ADJUSTING COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 25, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daidone & Engrissei, attorneys for appellant (Lawrence P. Engrissei, on the brief).

Pennington & Thompson, attorneys for respondents (William J. Bryers, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, PETRELLA and BAIME.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

This appeal presents difficult questions pertaining to whether the limitations period imposed by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a) under the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (the No Fault Law), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 et seq., is applicable in a suit instituted against the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund to recover personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. We hold that such actions must be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases