AFTER REMAND
PER CURIAM.
In our first opinion in this matter, we held that the medical malpractice arbitration act, MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq., was unconstitutional because the statutory agreement form failed to advise patients of the arbitration panel's statutorily mandated composition. Chief Judge DANHOF dissented.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.