The trial court found a failure of proof of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In so holding, it found that the robbery victim did not identify the defendant and that the only evidence against him was his own statement that he was with two other men when they met the victim on the street but, when one of his companions pulled out a gun, he, the defendant, ran away.
There was evidence that the victim was accosted by three men assuming a triangular pattern...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
