HARRELL v. FIRST UNION NAT. BANK

No. 847SC38.

334 S.E.2d 109 (1985)

A. Floyd HARRELL v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 17, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carr, Gibbons, Cozart and Jones by L.H. Gibbons, for plaintiff-appellant.

Connor, Bunn, Rogerson & Woodard by James F. Rogerson, for defendant-appellee.


WEBB, Judge.

This case brings to the Court a question as to whether testimony as to a conversation between the plaintiff and a loan officer of the defendant was properly held to be incompetent under the parol evidence rule. The parol evidence rule is not a rule of evidence but of substantive law. See E. Allan Farnsworth, Contracts, 447 et seq. It prohibits the consideration of evidence as to anything which happened prior to or simultaneously with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases