1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 377 N.W.2d
  5. 377 N.W.2d 62 (1985)
 

STATE v. FORD

No. CX-85-719.

377 N.W.2d 62 (1985)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. James A. FORD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted January 31, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, R. Kathleen Morris, Scott Co. Atty., Mary Yunker, Asst. Co. Atty., Shakopee, for respondent.

Phillip Gainsley, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered, and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and RANDALL and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant, James A. Ford, appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss the charges, from a judgment of conviction entered on April 10, 1985, and from an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to two of twelve charged counts.

Appellant makes two claims. Appellant first claims that the acts alleged in the complaint do not come within the scope of Minn.Stat. § 609.43(2) (1984). Appellant further claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases