SIKKING v. SELECTED RISKS INS. CO.


210 N.J. Super. 229 (1985)

509 A.2d 307

LINDA C. SIKKING, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF HERMAN J. SIKKING, PLAINTIFF, v. SELECTED RISKS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Cumberland County.

Decided October 18, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darrell M. Fineman for plaintiff (Capizola, Fineman & Kutner, attorneys).

John P. Morris for defendant (Horuvitz, Perlow, Morris & Baker, attorneys).


OPINION

KLEINER, J.S.C.

The novel question posed in this declaratory judgment suit is whether the interpretation of legislative intent of the PIP statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(d) and 39:6A-4(b), as set forth in Gambino v. Royal Globe Ins. Co., 86 N.J. 100 (1981), is applicable to the factual issues raised at trial.

In particular, the Court must determine whether the decedent, Herman Sikking, was an "income...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases