NASH v. MAHAN

No. C3-85-691.

377 N.W.2d 56 (1985)

Ronald E. NASH, et al., Respondents, v. John MAHAN, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 19, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James O. Ramstad, Detroit Lakes, for respondents.

Roderic E. Schuster, Fargo, N.D., David A. Stowman, Detroit Lakes, for appellants.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., LESLIE and NIERENGARTEN, JJ., without oral argument.


OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

In a quiet title action, the trial court found that respondents Nash adversely possessed a portion of land to which appellants Mahan had record title. Mahans brought this appeal, contending that while Nashs had adversely possessed part of the land, the trial court erred in finding that they adversely possessed the entire portion claimed. We reverse in part, affirm in part and remand.

FACTS

In 1980, respondents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases