Judgment affirmed.
At trial, defendant objected to the closing of the courtroom during the testimony of an undercover officer. At the hearing which preceded closure, the officer testified that he was still actively engaged as an undercover officer and was participating in "buy operations" in drug investigations in Kings County. The officer further revealed that he believed that his life was in danger as a "contract" had been taken out on his life. One of the officer...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
