1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 169 Cal.App.3d
  5. 169 Cal.App.3d 247 (1985)
 

RULINE NURSERY CO. v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR REL. BD.

Docket No. 28639.

169 Cal.App.3d 247 (1985)

216 Cal. Rptr. 162

RULINE NURSERY CO., Petitioner, v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

June 3, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Thomas M. Giovacchini, Thomas E. Campagne, James M. Schiavenza, Thomas J. Yin, Campagne & Giovacchini and Campagne & Schiavenza for Petitioner.

Manuel M. Medeiros, Daniel G. Stone and Nancy C. Smith for Respondent.

Dianna Lyons, Federico G. Chavez, Daniel A. Garcia and Wendy Sones for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

STANIFORTH, J.

Petitioner Ruline Nursery Co. (Ruline) seeks review of an Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) decision, 8 ALRB No. 105. The Board found Ruline had (1) refused to bargain with the United Farm Workers (UFW or Union); (2) unilaterally changed the terms and conditions of employment regarding holiday and vacation pay, hours of employment and wages; (3) failed to rehire Pedro Rivas and Guadalupe Ruiz...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases