1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 334 S.E.2d
  5. 334 S.E.2d 81 (1985)
 

HARRIS-TEETER SUPERMARKETS, INC. v. HAMPTON

No. 8514SC72.

334 S.E.2d 81 (1985)

HARRIS-TEETER SUPERMARKETS, INC. v. Alice W. HAMPTON.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 17, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Powe, Porter and Alphin by W. Travis Porter and David E. Fox, Durham, for plaintiff-appellant.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice by Deborah H. Hartzog and William C. Matthews, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

ARNOLD, Judge.

The defendant's motion for summary judgment was based upon two grounds. She argued that the option was not timely exercised, and that the conditions precedent to her obligations were not fulfilled. Summary judgment is appropriate only where there are no genuine and material issues of fact to be resolved. Texaco, Inc. v. Creel, 310 N.C. 695, 314 S.E.2d 506 (1984). However, if...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases