Submitted Jan. 9, 1985.
Decided April 5, 1985.
Per Curiam:
Appellant appeals his armed robbery conviction. We affirm.
During the trial, the prosecution elicited testimony regarding an oral statement made by the appellant shortly after his arrest. Appellant contends that this testimony should have been excluded because the oral statement had not been disclosed to the defense under Circuit Court Rule 103.
Under Rule 103, the prosecution...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
