1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 205 N.J.
  5. 205 N.J. Super. 208 (1985)
 

STATE v. NAJI

205 N.J. Super. 208 (1985)

500 A.2d 723

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TAALIB DIN NAJI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 7, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward P. Hannigan, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Thomas S. Smith, Acting Public Defender, attorney).

Larry R. Etzweiler, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General, attorney).

Before Judges KING, O'BRIEN and SIMPSON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

In this case defendant raises a double jeopardy issue after his resentencing pursuant to the doctrine announced in State v. Kovack, 91 N.J. 476, (1982). Defendant contends that (1) the sentencing judge had no jurisdiction to increase the sentence previously imposed upon him and (2) the increased sentence violated the Double Jeopardy clauses of the State and Federal constitutions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases