STATE EX REL. VAN AUKEN v. BROWN

No. 85-1643.

20 Ohio St. 3d 21 (1985)

THE STATE, EX REL. VAN AUKEN, v. BROWN, SECY. OF STATE, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 30, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Petkewitz, for relator.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Andrew I. Sutter, for respondent secretary of state.

John A. Pfefferle, prosecuting attorney, and Jeffrey A. Catri, for respondent board of elections.


Per Curiam.

Relator contends she has established residency in Kelleys Island precinct and respondents are under a clear legal duty to register her as a voter in the November 5 election.

Respondent board of elections contends that relator is precluded from relief in mandamus and from being registered for the November 5 election because she did not appeal the ruling of the board deleting her name from the registration lists. This argument is irrelevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases