1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 172 Cal.App.3d
  5. 172 Cal.App.3d 230 (1985)
 

PESCOSOLIDO v. MADDOCK

Docket No. F004537.

172 Cal.App.3d 230 (1985)

218 Cal. Rptr. 165

CARL A. PESCOSOLIDO, JR., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BEN MADDOCK, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

September 17, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy, Robert K. Carrol and Spencer H. Hipp for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Diana Lyons, Ellen J. Eggers, Daniel A. Garcia, Ira L. Gottlieb and Wendy Sones for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BEST, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of defendant Ben Maddock's general demurrer to plaintiffs' complaint. The demurrer was on the ground: "The complaint fails to state a cause of action for which relief can be granted, since defendant Maddock cannot be sued in his individual capacity as an agent of the UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO."

In sustaining the demurrer without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases