OSTERDYKE v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. C6-84-1873.

371 N.W.2d 30 (1985)

Kenneth OSTERDYKE, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 26, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas E. Schmidt, Grose, Von Holtum, Sieben & Schmidt, Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Laura S. Underkuffler, Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson, Adamson, Flaskamp & Brennan, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by NIERENGARTEN, P.J., and LANSING and RANDALL, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Appellant Kenneth Osterdyke brought this declaratory judgment action to reform his State Farm automobile insurance policy to include underinsured motorist coverage, claiming that State Farm failed to make a mandatory offer of underinsured coverage as required by Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 6(e) (1978) (repealed 1980). The trial court found that State Farm made a legally sufficient offer of underinsured coverage, and Osterdyke...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases