SOUTH CAROLINA INS. v. SOUTHEASTERN PAINTING

No. 8510SC111.

335 S.E.2d 66 (1985)

SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY v. SOUTHEASTERN PAINTING CO., INC., H. Angelo & Company, Inc., the Hanover Insurance Company, and Insurance Company of North America.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 15, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. Conely, Fuquay-Varina, for plaintiff-appellee.

Patterson, Dilthey, Clay, Cranfill, Sumner and Hartzog by Dan M. Hartzog, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee, The Hanover Ins. Co.

McCoy, Weaver, Wiggins, Cleveland and Raper by L. Stacy Weaver, Jr., Fayetteville, for defendant-appellant, H. Angelo & Co., Inc.


EAGLES, Judge.

Appellant excepts to the signing of the judgment including the findings of fact and conclusions of law. This broadside exception does not present for review the sufficiency of the evidence to support any particular finding of fact. An exception to the judgment raises only two questions of law: (1) whether the facts found support the conclusions of law and the judgment, and (2) whether error of law appears on the face of the record. City of Kings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases