1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 205 N.J.
  5. 205 N.J. Super. 196 (1985)
 

HELTON v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS. INS. CO.

205 N.J. Super. 196 (1985)

500 A.2d 717

WINIFRED HELTON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 30, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russell L. Needell argued the cause for appellant (John R. Knodel, attorney; John R. Knodel, on the brief).

Timothy E. Annin argued the cause for respondent (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys; Martin S. Pappaterra, on the brief).

Before Judges FRITZ and BAIME.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover personal injury protection benefits (PIP) under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. At the commencement of the trial, plaintiff's attorney stipulated that all medical bills had been paid by defendant with the exception of $1,821 in chiropractic fees relating to services which had been rendered after the filing of the complaint.1 Following presentation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases