VAN EVERY v. SEMTA

Docket No. 77163.

142 Mich. App. 256 (1985)

369 N.W.2d 875

VAN EVERY v. SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 13, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zeff, Zeff & Materna (by Howard J. Radner), and Charles P. Reisman, for plaintiff.

Plunkett, Cooney, Rutt, Watters, Stanczyk & Pedersen, P.C. (by Robert G. Kamenec), for defendant.

Before: CYNAR, P.J., and BEASLEY and R.E. ROBINSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Caribel Van Every and Robert Van Every, appeal as of right from a judgment of no cause of action rendered in favor of defendant, Southeastern Michigan Transportation Authority (SEMTA), on a jury verdict.

On appeal, plaintiffs raise four issues. First, plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred in denying their request to reread SJI 50.03. The trial court instructed the jury as follows:

"You should include each of the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases