1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 173 Cal.App.3d
  5. 173 Cal.App.3d 223 (1985)
 

FRESHMAN, MULVANEY, MARANTZ v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B010554.

173 Cal.App.3d 223 (1985)

218 Cal. Rptr. 533

FRESHMAN, MULVANEY, MARANTZ, COMSKY, KAHAN & DEUTSCH et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; CARL H. KREUGER, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

September 26, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Murchison & Cumming, B. Eric Nelson, George M. Wallace, Saltzburg, Ray & Bergman, Horvitz & Levy, Ellis J. Horvitz, Frederic D. Cohen, S. Thomas Todd and Michael Nava for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Jack A. Fuller for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

LAVINE, J.*

Pursuant to order of the Supreme Court dated March 29, 1985, an alternative writ of mandate was issued requiring the trial court to vacate the motion of petitioners for relief from default pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, or to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandate should not issue.

FACTS

Real party Carl Kreuger (Kreuger) is suing petitioner law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases