MAAKE v. ROSS OPERATING VALVE CO.

No. 2 CA-CIV 5392.

149 Ariz. 244 (1985)

717 P.2d 923

Wayne MAAKE and Mary E. Maake, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ROSS OPERATING VALVE COMPANY, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

Review Denied April 15, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dix, Rehling & Waterman by J. Stephen Dix, Tucson, for plaintiffs/appellants.

Kimble, Gothreau, Nelson & Cannon, P.C. by Stephen Kimble, Tucson, for defendant/appellee.


OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Appellant Maake seeks a reversal of the summary judgment granted in favor of appellee, Ross Operating Valve Company (Ross), contending there are material issues of fact as to whether or not Ross had a duty to warn of dangers in its product. We reverse, finding there is a fact issue as to whether Ross had a duty to warn.

Wayne Maake was an employee of Elgin Metal Products near Elgin, Arizona. In early April 1982, his employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases