The opinion of the court was delivered by FRITZ, P.J.A.D.
This case implicates a question, novel in New Jersey, respecting the admissibility of videotaped depositions in a criminal trial. Because of the nature of the question and the current and topical issues involving other but similar uses of videotaping including, but not limited to, the sequestered "live" videotaping of child victims of sexual abuse in lieu of actual appearance during a hearing (see L.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.