MILLER v. PRUDENT. PROP. & CAS. INS. CO.


344 Pa.Super. 28 (1985)

495 A.2d 973

Richard G. MILLER, Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided May 31, 1985.

Reargument Denied August 12, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald J. Mishkin, Stroudsburg, for appellant.

Robert M. Maskrey, Jr., Stroudsburg, for appellee.

Before OLSZEWSKI, MONTGOMERY and LEDERER, JJ.


OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

At issue is a claim for work loss benefits under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, 40 P.S. Sec. 1009.101 et seq. Ruling that the claim was time-barred, the lower court granted summary judgment in favor of Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company. This appeal followed.

Section 106(c)(1) requires commencement of suit within two years of the date the victim "suffers the loss and either knows or, in the exercise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases