EX PARTE MAYNARD v. PHIFER

22334

286 S.C. 76 (1985)

332 S.E.2d 99

Ex parte James C. MAYNARD, Appellant, v. Henry PHIFER, William I. Sutton and B. Bayles Mack, Respondents. In re James L. Maynard, Plaintiff, v. Henry PHIFER, Defendant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided May 28, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles W. Blackwell, of McMehan, Hancock & Blackwell, and Thomas A. McKinney, of McKinney & Givens, Rock Hill, for appellant.

W. Clarkson McDow, Jr., of Roddey, Carpenter & White, Rock Hill, for respondents.


Heard April 22, 1985.

Decided May 28, 1985.

NESS, Justice:

Appellant Maynard sought to have a judgment against respondent Phifer satisfied out of escrowed funds belonging to Phifer. The trial court held Maynard's claim was subordinate to an attachment lien held by respondent Sutton. We disagree and reverse.

Sutton attached certain real property owned by Phifer. Sutton and Phifer entered into an agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases