Judgment affirmed.
Defendant argues that it was error to permit two eyewitnesses to make an in-court identification of him. During the trial it was brought out that both of the witnesses were acquainted with the defendant. On the day of the murder they recognized him the moment he entered the apartment where the crime took place. Under such circumstances, no Wade hearing was required (People v Miles,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.