COM. v. DRIVER


343 Pa.Super. 13 (1985)

493 A.2d 778

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. William DRIVER, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed May 31, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry Rudofsky, Assistant District Attorney, Philadelphia, for Commonwealth, appellant.

Donald Bronstein, Assistant Public Defender, Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before WIEAND, WATKINS and GEISZ, JJ.


WIEAND, Judge:

William Driver was tried nonjury and was found guilty of robbery, conspiracy, theft, simple assault, and unauthorized use of a vehicle. Subsequently the trial court found the evidence insufficient to sustain the verdict, granted a motion in arrest of judgment, and discharged the defendant. The Commonwealth appealed. We reverse.

The effect of a motion in arrest of judgment is to admit all the facts which the prosecution's evidence tends to prove...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases