1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 327 S.E.2d
  5. 327 S.E.2d 14 (1985)
 

WOODRUFF v. SHUFORD

No. 8425SC704.

327 S.E.2d 14 (1985)

Howard WOODRUFF v. Robert L. SHUFORD, III.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 19, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilson & Palmer by W.C. Palmer, Lenoir, for plaintiff-appellee.

Rudisill & Brackett by Keith Bridges, Hickory, for defendant-appellant.

PHILLIPS, Judge.

For us to uphold the verdict directed against defendant we would have to determine that the foregoing evidence can lead only to the conclusion that defendant is indebted to plaintiff on an account stated in the amount of $11,891.35. Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390, 180 S.E.2d 297 (1971). That we cannot do, because other reasonable conclusions are possible, and a new trial is ordered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases