PIERCE v. CASADY

No. 57,484

11 Kan. App. 2d 23 (1985)

711 P.2d 766

JAMES B. PIERCE and MARY JO PIERCE, Appellees, v. PAUL CASADY and DeLENA CASADY, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Opinion filed December 31, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin H. Bideau III, of Bideau Law Offices, of Chanute, for appellants.

Richard G. Tucker, of Law Offices of Richard G. Tucker, of Parsons, for appellees.

Before ABBOTT, C.J., SWINEHART and MEYER, JJ.


ABBOTT, C.J.:

Defendants, Paul and DeLena Casady, appeal from the trial court's judgment that a tree growing on their property with branches overhanging the property of plaintiffs, James and Mary Jo Pierce, is a nuisance.

Plaintiffs and defendants are adjoining landowners. The dispute between them concerns a 75-year-old pecan tree, the trunk of which is on defendants' property but one foot away from plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases