STATE v. TOY

No. 83-1973-CR.

125 Wis.2d 216 (1985)

371 N.W.2d 386

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James TOY, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 5, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Mary E. Waitrovich, assistant state public defender.

For the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William L. Gansner, assistant attorney general.

Before Scott, C.J., Brown, P.J., and Nettesheim, J.


BROWN, P.J.

The major issue on appeal concerns the authority of a Wisconsin court to impose a sentence consecutive to a sentence earlier imposed in another state. The defendant, James Toy, maintains that Wisconsin courts are statutorily prohibited from imposing consecutive sentences in these situations. We reject his argument. We also reject his arguments relating to sufficiency of evidence and the failure to give a certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases