SOUTHAMPTON v. PLANNING BD.


109 A.D.2d 204 (1985)

Southampton Association, Inc., Appellant, v. Planning Board of the Village of Southampton, Respondent. George G. Semerjian, Intervenor-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 8, 1985


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Finkelstein, Lundberg, Crimmins & Yakaboski (Howard M. Finkelstein and Frank A. Isler of counsel), for appellant.

Emil F. DePetris (Richard E. DePetris of counsel), for respondent.

Reilly, Like & Schneider (Gilbert G. Flanagan and Bernard J. Reilly of counsel), for intervenor-respondent.

LAZER, J. P., MANGANO, BRACKEN and NIEHOFF, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Intervenor George G. Semerjian is the owner in fee of a parcel of real property consisting of 34 acres located in the Incorporated Village of Southampton. The property had been used as a working farm. It abuts Windmill Lane, Breese Lane and White Street. The easternmost portion of the property, consisting of about five acres, is improved with the historic Kendrick house and several outbuildings and is situated in the village's OD

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases